> On 9/6/2011 10:00 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:46:11AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>>>>>> I suspect bootmem changes have broken somewhere on 32-bit... try
>>>>>> inserting a few printk between each of the function calls at the
>>>>>> start
>>>>>> of paging_init to try to narrow down exactly where it fails.
>>>>> It's flush_cache_all_local() that fails.
>>>> 2.6.39.4 works.
>>>>
>>> Well... that's weird.
>>>
>> 0: 43 ff ff 40 ldb 7fa0(r31),r31
>>
>> Is the faulting insn, and %r31 is 00000000... so
>> we're looking at 32672, which looks suspiciously like
>> a negative offset from 32768.
>>
>> Looks like it's a null pointer dereference, there shouldn't be anything
>> useful at this address, if I remember our address space map correctly.
> The fault was code 7. Also, I don't think this instruction is in
> flush_cache_all_local
> (at least I don't see it in 64-bit kernel). So, I think the problem is
> in setting up the address
> space map.
>
> In my testing with 64-bit kernels, I have noticed that the first call to
> flush_cache_range
> doesn't have a range consistent with our 32-bit user address space.
This is a 32 bit kernel.
Eike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]