RE: [PATCH v5 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Adapt to HWMOD

["Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@xxxxxx>]

Hi Tony, Jon,

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:05:56, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 10:12 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Mohammed, Afzal <afzal@xxxxxx> [120620 07:57]:

> Therefore, I am wondering if Afzal's driver needs to register the gpmc
> devices outside of the gpmc_probe() and add the devices as children. Or
> maybe we tackle that when we migrate it to DT.

V6 of this series has been posted assuming that we tackle above issue
during DT migration

> >> For gpmc driver to calculate timings rather than platform code doing it,
> >> we first need to have a generalized way to calculate gpmc timings for
> >> all peripherals as well as have a logic to calculate timings based on
> >> time & cycles, correct ? (to make sure we are talking the same thing)
> > 
> > Yes that might be tricky..
> 
> I am wondering more and more if we need to do a clean-up of the timing
> calculations prior to driver migration ...

I propose to have clean-up of timing calculations after driver migration,
v6 of this series has been posted, except the controversial issue of clock,
I believe other issues has been addressed.

Please let me know your comments.

Regards
Afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html