Re: [PATCH v5 02/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Adapt to HWMOD

[Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx>]

On 06/14/2012 02:03 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote:
>  
>> If the clk handle for the gpmc is passed to the gpmc driver, then there
>> is no reason why the driver cannot do this.
> 
> I believe passing clk details through platform data is an abuse of
> clock framework.

Why? You currently have a global variable storing the clock handle. It
can be quite common for drivers to know the clock frequencies of their
functional clocks. How else can drivers calculate timings?

Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html