RE: [PATCH-V5 2/3] arm:omap:am33xx: Add AM335XEVM machine support

["Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@xxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 01:07:32, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> [120503 09:45]:
> > 
> > What about cpu_is_omap34xx() true for am33xx? Should we follow it?
> 
> Well are there components that could be used as is with that?
> If not, then it probably does not make sense.
> 

I am also in favor of not following cpu_is_omap34xx() for am33xx, but what about ARCH_OMAP?
I don't see that you are in agreement in creating ARCH_OMAPAM33XX. 
Does it make sense to say that, for am33xx, cpu_is_omap34xx() is false, but still it is under ARCH_OMAP3?


> BTW, you should post your patches on top of the clean-up patches
> Santosh posted as that already leaves out some cpu_is_omapxxxx
> checks. That's the "ARM: OMAP2+: Misc cleanup" thread.
> 

Ok. I will do that.

Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html