Re: [PATCH v9 11/25] gpio/omap: cleanup omap_gpio_mod_init function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh
<santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:04 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
> <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> * DebBarma, Tarun Kanti <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> [120424 08:40]:
>>>> Hi Janusz,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:24 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
>>>> <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Janusz Krzysztofik
>>>> > <jkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >> On Thursday 02 of February 2012 23:00:37 Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
>>>> >>> With register offsets now defined for respective OMAP versions we can get rid
>>>> >>> of cpu_class_* checks. This function now has common initialization code for
>>>> >>> all OMAP versions...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx>
>>>> >>> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@xxxxxx>
>>>> >>> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
>>>> >>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Sorry for being so late with my comment for chanes already present in
>>>> >> mainline, but this patch breaks GPIO on Amstrad Delta at least, and I
>>>> >> have neither enough spare time nor enough experience with non OMAP1
>>>> >> machines to provide a solution myself.
>>>> > Yes, I looked at the omap_gpio_mod_init() and OMAP1 configurations are
>>>> > overwritten.
>>>> > Also looks like there is issue in making distinction between omap15xx
>>>> > and omap16xx.
>>>> > I will post a patch and you can help me testing it in OMAP1 platform.
>>>> > Thanks for pointing this out.
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Here is the patch, with attachment as well. I have just tested on
>>>> OMAP4 platform.
>>>> Testing on other OMAP2+ platforms is pending. In the meantime can you please
>>>> validate on OMAP1 platform and confirm? Thanks.
>>>> --
>>>> Tarun
>>>>
>>>> From: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:34:32 +0530
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gpio/omap: fix omap1 register overwrite in omap_gpio_mod_init
>>>>
>>>> Initialization of irqenable, irqstatus registers is the common
>>>> operation done in this function for all OMAP platforms, viz.
>>>> OMAP1, OMAP2+. The latter _gpio_rmw()'s to irqenable register
>>>> was overwriting the correctly programmed OMAP1 value at the
>>>> beginning. As a result, even though it worked on OMAP2+
>>>> platforms it was breaking OMAP1 functionality.
>>>
>>> Sounds like the original patch was never tested on omap1?
>> That's right, only bootup test was done on OMAP1710-SDP.
>>
>>>
>>>> On closer observation it is found that the first _gpio_rmw()
>>>> which is supposedly done to take care of OMAP1 platform is
>>>> generic enough and takes care of OMAP2+ platform as well.
>>>> Therefore remove the latter _gpio_rmw() to irqenable as they
>>>> are redundant.
>>>>
>>>> Also, changing the sequence and logic of initializing the
>>>> irqstatus.
>>>
>>> Please mention also the breaking commit here and get this fix
>>> merged as a regression as soon as it's tested for the current
>>> -rc series.
>> Sure, I will do that!
>
> Looks like it is regression on 3.4 as well so CC stable when you
> post the patch.
Ok, I will do that.
--
Tarun
>
> Regards
> Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux