Re: [PATCH 0/6] [v2] omap:mailbox-enhancements and fixes
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Hi Hari, On 11/10/2010 1:45 PM, Hari Kanigeri wrote:
Thanks to Rene Sapiens and Omar Ramirez for their inputs on initial patch set. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg37278.html The patch set addresses the following review comments from Rene and Omar. http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg37626.html https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/255091/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/255081/ Following patches are changed because of above review comments: omap:mailbox-send message in process context omap:mailbox-add notification support for multiple readers Following patch is dropped from initial patch set omap:mailbox-resolve multiple receiver problem The patch set is tested on omap4 SDP board. Fernando Guzman Lugo (1): mailbox: change full flag per mailbox queue instead of global Hari Kanigeri (5): omap:mailbox: fix rx interrupt disable in omap4 omap:mailbox-fix checkpatch warnings
That one is weird? How can you submit a patch that fix checkpatch?In theory you should not send any patch that generate checkpatch error or warning.
omap:mailbox-send message in process context omap:mailbox-add notification support for multiple readers omap:clocks44x-add dummy clock for mailbox
We are trying to enforce some consistency in the subjects name so you should name your patches like that:
OMAP: mailbox: fix rx interrupt disable in omap4 OMAP: mailbox: fix checkpatch warnings OMAP: mailbox: send message in process context OMAP: mailbox: add notification support for multiple readers OMAP4: clocks: add dummy clock for mailbox Regards, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html