[PATCH 5/7] Use strtoull instead of strtoul where applicable
When parsing into u64 or unsigned long long storage, we should use the
correct library function.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
bin/dumpseg.c | 4 ++--
sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/dumpseg.c b/bin/dumpseg.c
index fbc587d..d6b4290 100644
--- a/bin/dumpseg.c
+++ b/bin/dumpseg.c
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
fprintf(stderr, "%s: too few arguments\n", progname);
exit(1);
} else {
- strtoul(argv[optind], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
+ strtoull(argv[optind], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
if (*endptr == '\0')
dev = NULL;
else
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
status = 0;
for (i = optind; i < argc; i++) {
- segnum = strtoul(argv[i], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
+ segnum = strtoull(argv[i], &endptr, DUMPSEG_BASE);
if (*endptr != '\0') {
fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s: invalid segment number\n",
progname, argv[i]);
diff --git a/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c b/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c
index 9d92b67..25aa14a 100644
--- a/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c
+++ b/sbin/nilfs-clean/nilfs-clean.c
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static int nilfs_clean_parse_protection_period(const char *arg)
char *endptr;
int ret = 0;
- period = strtoul(arg, &endptr, 10);
+ period = strtoull(arg, &endptr, 10);
if (endptr == arg) {
myprintf(_("Error: invalid protection period: %s\n"), arg);
ret = -1;
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Filesystem; Devel]
[Linux CIFS]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]