[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: production ready?



On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Ryusuke Konishi
<konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
...
> NILFS2 is almost stable.  We have a record of nine months operation on
> in-house samba servers and a webDAV server.
>
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:14:46 -0500, Dwight Schauer wrote:
>> Hello NILFS2 users and developers,
>>
>> How stable do you consider NILFS2? Performance issues aside, I'm more
>> concerned about reliability.
>>

On my side, it is on my laptop /home partition for a bit more than a
year, first month had corruption because of a bug which was fixed,
then a 2 months later corruption caused by garbage collector not
acting correctly when date is adjusted backward (in fact, forward then
backward in my case). But now it is corruption free and I can see it
when making a backup, no more I/O errors! Had some partition full
problems because garbage collector wouldn't start doing it's job until
I restarted it, but else it's OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Filesystem; Devel]     [Linux CIFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux