Re: [nfs:devel 46/51] fs/nfs/write.c:1592:5: error: redefinition of 'nfs_commit_inode'

[Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > Easy enough, the patch that fixes it is the last one in the series that I sent in yesterday.
> 
> I don't understand. That is the patch series that Fengguang was testing
> afaik. His tests were on 
> 
> tree:   git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git devel
> head:   5c13c9e1c15ee2ca9ab2b953224001af53d9be09
> 
> which includes your patch series from yesterday, no?

Trond, I typically do commit-by-commit tests and will complain if
*any* point of the tree is not bisect-able. A fix at the HEAD won't
stop the email notification for a defect in the middle point..

On the other hand, I do maintain a list of non-rebaseable
tree/branches, on which the HEAD commit will be tested first, and only
if any problems are found, go back to find out the first bad commit.

If you prefer the latter behavior, I can add your tree or any branch
of it to the non-rebaseable list.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html