Re: [PATCH 13/20] NFS: Fix recovery from NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:04 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 14:43 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:55 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 12:24 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>>> On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>> Then lets move the flavour out of the clientid string,
> >> 
> >> Removing the flavor from the nfs_client_id4 string makes sense.
> >> 
> >>> and just settle
> >>> for handling CLID_INUSE by changing the flavour on the SETCLIENTID call.
> >> 
> >> This is where I get hazy.  
> >> 
> >> If I simply change the authentication flavor on the existing clp->cl_rpcclient, will this affect ongoing RENEW operations that also use this transport?  Do we want subsequent RENEW operations to use the new flavor?
> >> 
> >> Thinking hypothetically, it seems to me that CLID_INUSE is really an indication of a permanent configuration error, or a software bug, and we should not bother to recover.  But maybe that's my limited imagination.  Under what use cases do you think CLID_INUSE might occur and it might be useful to attempt recovery?
> >> 
> > 
> > The server caches the principal name that was used to call SETCLIENTID
> > when the lease was established. Any attempt to call SETCLIENTID with a
> > different principal will result in CLID_INUSE unless the lease has
> > expired.
> > 
> > So what I was proposing wasn't that you try to change the authentication
> > flavour on an existing nfs_client. It was that when you are probing, you
> > can use the CLID_INUSE reply from SETCLIENTID as a direct indication
> > that the server is indeed trunked, and that you already hold a lease on
> > that server, but that the authentication flavour that you are trying to
> > use is wrong.
> 
> The use case would be that my client has mounted a server via address X using authentication flavor 1, and then tries to mount the same server via address Y using authentication flavor 2.

...for which the result should be that all setclientid/confirm and renew
requests will use flavour 1.

> Do we even need to retry the SETCLIENTID and to perform a SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM in that case?

Yes. Otherwise we end up with 2 leases on the same server. We don't want
to do that...

> Now, what about nfs4_reclaim_lease() ?  If the client sees CLID_INUSE during a lease reclaim, no trunking discovery is involved.

That would mean that the lease was expired, and that someone sent a
SETCLIENTID call to the server using our clientid string, but using the
wrong principal. There are 2 cases:

1) Someone is spoofing our client. I've no idea how to recover from
this, short of changing the clientid string.

2) The server is trunked, the lease expired, and we happened to call
'mount' while it was expired, and inadvertently sent a SETCLIENTID
+SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM call to the server using a different IP address,
and using the wrong principal.


-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥



[Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Info]    [Yosemite Photos]    [POF Sucks]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux