Re: Another try at LNFS?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On 04/05/2012 17:26, David Quigley wrote:
On 04/05/2012 13:15, Myklebust, Trond wrote:On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 13:02 -0400, David Quigley wrote:Now that we're past the 3.4 merge window should I post the LNFS modifications for review for when 3.5 rolls around?The sooner the better. It looks as if there will be quite a bit of stuffgoing into 3.5, so it would be nice to maximise our testing window. Thanks! TrondI have a mostly working copy for 3.2 which I can forward port but I'mhaving an issue with it. The revalidate code changed at some point andjust to get things working I dropped a piece of code from the patchset that I couldn't figure out how to transition to the new revalidatecode. Unfortunately this is the initial get of the security label so the security label is invalid until the first cache invalidation. Any suggestions on where to place this code? I can give you the original code snippet when I get home that I dropped. Dave --To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" inthe body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Looking at my patches it looks like nfs_lookup_revalidate was changed and at the time I couldn't figure out what it was changed to.
Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html