Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFS: dont allow minorversion= opt when vers != 4

[Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/02/12 12:03, Adamson, Dros wrote:

> 
> On Feb 2, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> 
>> On 02/01/12 18:07, Adamson, Dros wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 02/01/2012 09:06 PM, Weston Andros Adamson wrote:
>>>>> Don't allow invalid 'vers' and 'minorversion' combinations in mount options,
>>>>> such as "vers=3,minorversion=1".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just my $0.017 I don't see the point in this. 
>>>>
>>>> If vers==3 then minorversion is ignored, just like today.
>>>> What kind  of extra protection does it buy us?
>>>
>>> No, minorversion is not ignored when vers=3.  
>>
>>
>> But after mounting, does setting vers=3, minorversion=1 cause any change in NFS v3 behavior?
>>
> 
> No it doesn't.  Past the parsing of options, minorversion is ignored for versions other than 4.
> 
> I just don't understand how anyone can have problem with this patch.  Why would we want to validate minorversion in some cases, but not all cases?  How would this patch be a bad thing?
> 

I don't have a problem with the patch, it makes sense that we shouldn't confuse developers or users.  I was just curious if there was a spot where we had "if minor_version == 1: do_something()" without checking for major_version == 4.

- Bryan

> It's about usability -- if this can confuse NFS developers, how are end users going to handle it?
> 
> -dros


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html