RE: [PATCH linux-next] dmaengine: add context parameter fixups

["Bounine, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Bounine@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, March 26, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] dmaengine: add context parameter fixups
> 
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:42 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 12:23 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >
> > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/96215
> >
> > > And this seems to be linux-next.
> >
> > > Mark, Is this part of the sound updates that went to Linus?
> >
> > No, not yet - it was only sent after the merge window.  Quite why
> nobody
> > managed to notice it before then I don't know.  It'll go to him soon,
> or
> > at least to Takashi, but don't know if it'll make -rc1 or not.
> I should have noticed that sound needs update as well  :(
> 
> Now either I drop these from 3.4 or merge Linus's tree and apply
> Alexandre's fix (as that is the right fix rather than one in asoc tree)
> And since this was required for RIO patches which are still WIP, I
> think
> I am leaning towards former.
> 

I do not see any sense in dropping these API changes now.
Some audio files have been missed form the original patch because I did
not have them in the code tree when patch was built.
For those who was not in the list for original patches here is a link to
the patch details: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/8/373

If we drop the API changes now we will need redo these changes again later.
We already dragged these changes long enough since original discussion in October.
I will send new inline wrapper for RapidIO today. 

Alex.


��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f