- Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] dmaengine: add context parameter fixups
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:37:57 +0530
- Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@xxxxxxx>, paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx, samuel@xxxxxxxxxx, lrg@xxxxxx, perex@xxxxxxxx, tiwai@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20120326110149.GL3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
- References: <1332511242-30241-1-git-send-email-alexandre.bounine@idt.com> <CAOMZO5B-Zutv-xwqLCAgNMO8A3Kyg4uWqS41koo-yoS4mGB1TQ@mail.gmail.com> <1332740082.19804.15.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <20120326094200.GA3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1332755670.19804.91.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <20120326103354.GD3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1332758906.19804.97.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <20120326110149.GL3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:01 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:18:26PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > But we don't want the clients to use this additional parameter or be
> > exposed to it if not required. Every client is expected to use the
> > dmaengine wrappers for prepare and not invoke .device_ callbacks.
>
> Are those wrappers present in what's gone to Linus' tree, and can
> someone please send a patch to convert to using them?
Yes that are already there :-)
I will send sound specific update now
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]