- Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] dmaengine: add context parameter fixups
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:01:49 +0100
- Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>, Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@xxxxxxx>, paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx, samuel@xxxxxxxxxx, lrg@xxxxxx, perex@xxxxxxxx, tiwai@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1332758906.19804.97.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
- References: <1332511242-30241-1-git-send-email-alexandre.bounine@idt.com> <CAOMZO5B-Zutv-xwqLCAgNMO8A3Kyg4uWqS41koo-yoS4mGB1TQ@mail.gmail.com> <1332740082.19804.15.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <20120326094200.GA3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1332755670.19804.91.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <20120326103354.GD3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1332758906.19804.97.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:18:26PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> But we don't want the clients to use this additional parameter or be
> exposed to it if not required. Every client is expected to use the
> dmaengine wrappers for prepare and not invoke .device_ callbacks.
Are those wrappers present in what's gone to Linus' tree, and can
someone please send a patch to convert to using them?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
