On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:51 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Mikey,
>
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ.
> >
> > In fact, keeping MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ seems to make SPARSE_IRQ user
> > selectable, which we don't want anymore since ad5b7f1350c2.
>
> Yes, indeed. I will fix up the merge resolution for tomorrow.
This is my fault. Grant's patch had a collision and I manually fixed it
up. While doing that, I put back MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ which the patch
originally took out.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]