RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:54:37PM -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
> > >
> > > > OK, I have just posted the ramster v5 patchset which applies against
> > > > linux-3.2.  I've test-built it against linux-next... it only gets
> > > > the normal minor merge conflicts for adding a line to
> > > > drivers/staging/Makefile and Kconfig.
> > >
> > > Please resend after fixing that conflict, as it would require me to edit
> > > it by hand in order to apply this.  As you have already redone the
> > > patch, there's no reason I should have to do this, right?
> >
> > Do you want me to resend all 6 patches?  The only patch
> > affected is patch 6 of 6.  All others apply cleanly.
> > Let me know and I will resend one or all tomorrow.
> All would be best, also please thread them properly, 'git send-email'
> will do this for you, please use it.

OK, posted (*).  BTW, I _was_ using git send-email, just didn't know
that "git send-email patch0 patch1 patch2 ..." would cause them
to be threaded.  (I was using git send-email patch0;
git send-email patch1; git send-email patch2...)

Thanks again for your patience and help!  I think RAMster
can now be successfully queued with no linux-next merge issues!


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Add to Google Powered by Linux