Re: linux-next: Tree for May 24 (ratelimits, CONFIG_PRINTK not enabled)

[Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:33 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011 14:02:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Changes since 20110523:
> when CONFIG_PRINTK is not enabled:
> net/core/filter.c:353: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE'
> net/core/filter.c:353: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
> net/core/filter.c:353: error: invalid storage class for function 'DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE'
> net/core/filter.c:353: error: implicit declaration of function '__ratelimit'
> net/core/filter.c:353: error: '_rs' undeclared (first use in this function)

Thanks for the report Randy.

I wonder if it's better to new create sections for
!CONFIG_PRINTK in bug.h.  That might make the image
a bit smaller when !CONFIG_PRINTK too.

> Adding <linux/ratelimit.h> to <asm-generic/bug.h> causes other problems:

Yup, that's not a good solution.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html