Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (rfkill)

[Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:22 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> CFG80211=y
> MAC80211=y
> RFKILL=m
> 
> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call':
> core.c:(.text+0xa678b): undefined reference to `rfkill_blocked'
> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_dev_free':

Hrm. I thought

config CFG80211
	tristate "Improved wireless configuration API"
	depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL

would avoid that. Why doesn't it?

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part