Re: [PATCH 09/12] x86: Add static initiazlier for descriptors | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Joe Damato wrote:
Add static initializer for LDT/GDT/TSS descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <ice799@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/asm-x86/desc_defs.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/desc_defs.h b/include/asm-x86/desc_defs.h
index a1c6516..5119051 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/desc_defs.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/desc_defs.h
@@ -91,6 +91,20 @@ typedef struct desc_struct tss_desc;
, .dpl = (hi >> 13) & 3 \
, .p = (hi >> 15) & 1 \
, .base1 = (hi >> 16) & 0xffff }
+#define __DESC_INITIALIZER(lo,hi) \
+ { .limit0 = lo & 0xffff \
+ , .base0 = (lo >> 16) & 0xffff \
+ , .base1 = hi & 0xff \
+ , .type = (hi >> 8) & 0xf \
+ , .s = (hi >> 12) & 1 \
+ , .dpl = (hi >> 13) & 3 \
+ , .p = (hi >> 15) & 1 \
+ , .limit = (hi >> 16) & 0xf \
+ , .avl = (hi >> 20) & 1 \
+ , .l = (hi >> 21) & 1 \
+ , .d = (hi >> 22) & 1 \
+ , .g = (hi >> 23) & 1 \
+ ,.base2 = (hi >> 24) & 0xf }
Reasonable as a transition, I guess, but it would be better to just make the initializers pass in proper values. But I think it would be better to implement this with a union rather than repacking the packed values.
J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
[Site Home] [Audio] [Hams] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Writing Drivers] [Photo] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources] [Fedora Users]
![]() |