On 4/24/07, Rick Brown <rick.brown.3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > NPTL on 2.4?
>
> this can be done only if you backport the features from 2.6 that were
> added in order to make NPTL possible ... redhat has done this, but
> really it's just a waste of time ... 2.4 is dead :P
Could you hint upon the kernel features required for NPTL? May be a link?
i couldnt really guess. your only safe bet is to go get a redhat
kernel. i think it's a waste either way, but that's me.
> > pthreads on 2.6?
>
> i really have no idea what you mean by this ... "pthreads" is short
> for "POSIX threads" and there's no such thing as "pthreads" with
> respect to a specific code base. NPTL is one implementation of the
> POSIX threads specification while LinuxThreads is another.
Sorry ... I meant LinuxThreads.
linuxthreads works fine on 2.6 ... linux has forward binary
compatibility, thus things that work in 2.4 (like linuxthreads)
continue to work in 2.6
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
[Site Home]
[Audio]
[Hams]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Memory]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux Resources]
[Fedora Users]
