On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 04:29 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> FYI I am diagnosing an unlikely locking issue on a RHEL system right now
> that triggers when you have a read-only filesystem and can't use file
> locks. I know we ripped out a lot of that code since in upstream but I
> might need to address this differently. I'll followup with my findings.
I have written a sysV shared memory locking mechanism that using an shm
segment in the case that the filesystem is mounted read-only. I'll
finish the work on the RHEL bug and then forward port it, and post. We
can probably re-introduce this because it works in a read-only context
and can't be abused by a user to prevent module loading because the IPC
shm segment is user-specific. Only downside is (optional, I guess)
dependency on sysV shm. But I don't think we honestly have anyone
wanting to use m-i-t on a system without such things compiled in.
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Home]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Video Projectors]
[PDAs]
[Free Online Dating]
[Hacking TiVo]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Devices]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[16.7MP]