Re: [PATCH] link modprobe.d(5) to modprobe.conf(5)

[Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:05 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> On 5/26/09, Robby Workman <rworkman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 May 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> >> Some people expect to be able to do `man modprobe.d` and see the relevant
> >> content.  Not surprising considering modprobe.conf(5) already documents
> >> that.
> >
> >
> > Ah yes, definite agreement here.  We already do that in our builds,
> > so it somehow didn't even occur to me that it should be done upstream.
> 
> Hey, I see you added this link, what about adding depmod.d ->
> depmod.conf as well?

Sure, sounds good.

It's annoying how you end up having to do this (see the patch) because
of how the XML utilities (docbook2man) behave in only creating a file
for the last entry, and at least in the case of Fedora do not support
that --solinks option being discussed before.

Jon.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html