Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: A new flag SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING_TIMER

[Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 29 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> Add a new flag of SDHCI_NEEDS_RETUNING_TIMER to represent if the host
> needs retuning timer currently when driving the card inserted.
>
> This flag is set when the host does tuning the first time for the card
> and is used afterwards whenever needs to decide if the host is currently
> using a retuning timer.
>
> This flag is cleared when the card is removed in sdhci_reinit.
>
> The set/clear of the flag and the start/stop of the retuning timer is
> associated with the card's init/remove time, so there is no need to
> touch it when the host is to be removed as at that time the card should
> have already been removed.

[...]
> @@ -3097,10 +3092,6 @@ void sdhci_remove_host(struct sdhci_host *host, int dead)
>  
>  	free_irq(host->irq, host);
>  
> -	del_timer_sync(&host->timer);
> -	if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_300)
> -		del_timer_sync(&host->tuning_timer);
> -
>  	tasklet_kill(&host->card_tasklet);
>  	tasklet_kill(&host->finish_tasklet);

The last paragraph of the commit message explains why you remove the
del_timer_sync() call on the tuning_timer; but why do you remove it
from the main (timeouts) host->timer too?

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html