On Fri 18-05-12 00:04:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 17:43 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > +static struct timer_list writeout_period_timer =
> > + TIMER_DEFERRED_INITIALIZER(writeout_period, 0, 0);
>
> So the problem with using a deferred timer is that it 'ignores' idle
> time. So if a very busy period is followed by a real quiet period you'd
> expect all the proportions to have aged to 0, but they won't have.
Ah, I see. Thanks for warning me.
> One way to solve that is to track a jiffies count of the last time the
> timer triggered and compute the missed periods from that and extend
> fprop_new_period() to deal with period increments of more than 1.
Yeah, that should be easy enough so I'll try it that way since I presume
it's nicer to power usage to use deferred timers if it's reasonably
possible.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
[Site Home]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[ECOS]
[Tools]
[DDR & Rambus]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
[Monitors]