On Wed, 16 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 12:15 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > In the far future one could envision that the current allocators will
> > just become storage algorithms that can be chosen based on the need of
> > the subsystem. F.e.
> >
> > Cpu cache dependend performance = Bonwick allocator (SLAB)
> > Minimal cycle count and cache footprint = SLUB
> > Maximum storage density = SLOB
>
> While we are at it, do we plan to lift the vowel-only usage restriction and
> start allowing consonants for the 3rd letter? We're running short of vowels,
> so we can only accommodate 2 more allocators if this restriction stays.
Well if we go to storage algorithms then we can have free naming.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
[Site Home]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[ECOS]
[Tools]
[DDR & Rambus]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
[Monitors]
