Re: [PATCH 07/39] autonuma: introduce kthread_bind_node()

[Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 17:22 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I don't see what's wrong with more than 1 CPU in the hard bind
> cpumask.

Because its currently broken, but we're trying to restore its pure
semantic so that we can use it in more places again, like
debug_smp_processor_id(). Testing a single process flag is _much_
cheaper than testing ->cpus_allowed.

Adding more broken isn't an option.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href