Re: [PATCH 07/39] autonuma: introduce kthread_bind_node()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 19:45 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> +void kthread_bind_node(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
> +{
> +       /* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
> +       if (!wait_task_inactive(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)) {
> +               WARN_ON(1);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* It's safe because the task is inactive. */
> +       do_set_cpus_allowed(p, cpumask_of_node(nid));
> +       p->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_bind_node);

That's a wrong use of PF_THREAD_BOUND, we should only use that for
cpumask_weight(tsk_cpus_allowed()) == 1.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Site Home]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Tools]     [DDR & Rambus]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]

Add to Google Google PageRank Checking tool