Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 26/26] uprobes: queue signals while thread is singlestepping.

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/06, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> The patch (that I sent out as part of v5 patchset) uses per task
> pending sigqueue and start queueing the signals when the task
> singlesteps. After completion of singlestep, walks thro the pending
> signals.

Yes, I see. Doesn't look very nice ;)

> But I was thinking if I should block signals instead of queueing them in
> a different sigqueue. So Idea is to block signals just before the task
> enables singlestep and unblock after task disables singlestep.

Agreed, this looks much, much better. In both cases the task is current,
it is safe to change ->blocked.

But please avoid sigprocmask(), we have set_current_blocked().

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>