Re: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dma-mapping: use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:27:17AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> > > > > > > I suppose for the majority of the cases, the overhead of the indirect
> > > > > > > function call is near-zero, compared to the overhead of the cache
> > > > > > > management operation, so it would only make a difference for coherent
> > > > > > > systems without an IOMMU. Do we care about micro-optimizing those?
> > > > 
> > > > FWIW, when I was hacking on ARM access point routing performance some
> > > > time ago, turning the L1/L2 cache maintenance operations into inline
> > > > functions (inlined into the ethernet driver) gave me a significant and
> > > > measurable performance boost.
> > > 
> > > On what architecture?  Can you show what you did to gain that?
> > 
> > Patch is attached below.  It's an ugly product-specific hack, not
> > suitable for upstreaming in this form, etc etc, but IIRC it gave me
> > a ~5% improvement on packet routing.
> 
> Do you know how much is contributed from each change - L1, L2, moving
> dma_cache_maint() inline, removing the virt_addr_valid() etc?

Sorry, I'm not sure -- I never tested it to that granularity, and I
don't have access to the hardware anymore now.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]