- To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v1] implement SL*B and stack usercopy runtime checks
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:37:55 -0700
- Cc: kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: linux-mm-outgoing@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: int-list-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20110703192442.GA9504@albatros>
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 23:24 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> Btw, if the perfomance will be acceptable, what do you think about
> logging/reacting on the spotted overflows?
If you do, it might be useful to track the found location(s)
and only emit the overflow log entry once as found.
Maybe use __builtin_return_address(depth) for tracking.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
[Site Home]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux]
[Linux OMAP]
[Linux MIPS]
[ECOS]
[Tools]
[DDR & Rambus]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]
[Monitors]