[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] get rid of fe_ioctl_override()



On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is not how it works. Patches are posted at the ML and developers can
> review and comment about them. Does those patches break something? If not,
> please stop flaming.

I'm confused why you think this email was a flame.  It's asked three
very straight-forward questions that could have easily have been asked
of any submitter who failed to cc: the maintainer for a particular
driver in the patch submission.

> With regards to Cc the driver maintainer (mkrufky), the patch also got
> forwarded to him, in priv (it were supposed to be sent via git send-email,
> but, as it wasn't, the patch was manually forwarded for him to review,
> just after the patchbomb).

Stating that a clerical error had been made during the git send-email
and thus you forwarded it to him in private would have been a
perfectly reasonable answer to my question.

No need to create drama where there isn't any.

Devin

-- 
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Devices]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux