|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On 10.05.2012 17:14, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 08-05-2012 10:12, Antti Palosaari escreveu:Factors behind the changes are mostly coming from the fact current struct dvb_usb_device_properties contains so many static configuration options. You cannot change single dvb_usb_device_properties easily (safely) at runtime since it is usually driver global struct and thus shared between all the DVB USB driver instances. That fits just fine for the traditional devices where all configuration is same for the devices having single USB ID. Nowadays we have more and more devices that are based of chipset vendor reference designs - even using just single USB ID chipset vendor have given for that chipset. These reference designs still varies much about used chips and configurations. Configuring different base chips, USB-bridge, demod, tuner, and also peripheral properties like dual tuners, remotes and CI is needed to do runtime because of single USB ID is used for that all.Drivers waste lots of space with dvb_usb_device_properties, as this struct is HUGE. Also, the structure index number need to match the USB ID table index, which causes merge troubles from time to time, breaking existing cards when new ones are added. Also, if the remote controller is different, a series of data needs to be duplicated into a separate entry.
Yes, that was one thing what I have keep in my mind. Due to I planned to move remote keytable same place as a device name and USB-IDs are (as later in that RFC was defined).
IMHO, it would be better to re-design it to avoid wasting space without need.
Could be clearer situation but also much more work. Implementing all issues mentioned by this RFC should reduce used space a lot, I think likely 50% or so.
My personal innovator behind all these is problems I met when developing AF9015 and AF9035 drivers. Also RTL2831U and RTL2832U are kinda similar and have given some more motivation. Here is small list what I am planning to do. It is surely so much work that everything is not possible, but lets try to select most important and easiest as a higher priority. resume / suspend support ------------------- * very important feature * crashes currently when DVB USB tries to download firmware when resuming from suspend read_config1 ------------------- * new callback to do initial tweaks * very first callback * is that really needed?Calling it as "read_config1" is not nice, as "1" has no strong meaning. It would be better to name it as "read_config_early", if this is needed.
I think I will drop that, after all I think it is not much needed. The idea for that was something like "probe chipset version" for firmware select as there is some chipset selecting firmware according to chip revision. But such small decisions are better to made inside firmware download callback. Also due to that static firmware name should be replaced by callback that selects firmware.
read_mac_address => read_config2 ------------------- * rename it read_config2 or read_config if read_config1 is not implemented at all"read_config" seems a good name for it.* rename old callback and extend it usage as a more general * only 8 devices use currently* when returned mac != 0 => print mac address as earlier, otherwise work as a general callbackPlease, don't do that. Different behaviors if mac is filled (or not) is a very bad idea.
Actually look it like a extended behaviour (MAC address is extended behaviour of read_config). MAC address is read from the eeprom and so it device configuration on many cases. There was only 8 devices using MAC address so own callback for it is waste of space.
For my eyes returning MAC address as a .read_config() parameter is something like very good idea.
new callback init() ------------------- * called after tuner attach to initialize rest of device * good place to do some general settings - configure endpoints - configure remote controller - configure + attach CI change DVB-USB to dynamic debug ------------------- * use Kernel new dynamic debugs instead of own proprietary system download_firmware ------------------- * struct usb_device => struct dvb_usb_device * we need access for the DVB USB driver state in every callback identify_state ------------------- * struct usb_device => struct dvb_usb_device * we need access for the DVB USB driver state in every callbackIMO, all callbacks should use the same argument (either usb_device or dvb_usb_device).
YES! That is the reason I am changing it :)All callbacks inside DVB-USB should get pointer to dvb_usb_device or some other pointer which is deeper than dvb_usb_device (like ptr to FE).
The requirement of changing that is coming from the fact there is some values needed to store to the state (like USB message sequence numbers). For example AF9015/AF9035/IT9135/IT9137... fortunately those still works currently since firmware never checks sequence counter validly.
attach all given adapter frontends as once ------------------- * for the MFE devices attach all frontends as onceWe should first clean-up the bad/legacy MFE drivers, as most use MFE to implement a single FE chipset that supports more than one delivery system.
I think there is only 3 DVB USB drivers using MFE - and all those contains different physical demods. Those are anysee, mxl111sf and ttusb2.
* deregister all frontends if error returned* small effect only for MFE attach all given adapter tuners as once ------------------- * deregister all frontends if error returned * small effect only for MFE make remote dynamically configurable -------------------The first step here is to remove rc.legacy stuff.* default keytable mapped same level with USB-ID& device name etc. * there is generally 3 things that could be mapped to USB ID - USB IDs (cold + warm) - device name - remote controller keytable - all the others could be resolved& configured dynamically * it is not only keytable but whole remote should be changed dynamically configurableThe issue with IR is because of the issue with struct dvb_usb_device_properties. If you take a look at em28xx implementation, for example, there's just one parameter for the IR keytables that determine if a device will be loaded with or without IR: the RC keytable. re-designing dvb_usb_device_properties should fix it.make stream dynamically configurable ------------------- * we need change stream parameters in certain situations - there is multiple endpoints but shared MFE - need to set params according to stream bandwidth (USB1.1, DVB-T, DVB-C2 in same device) - leave old static configrations as those are but add callbacks to get new values at runtime dynamically growing device list in dvb_usb_device_properties ------------------- * currently number of devices are limited statically * there is devices having ~50 or more IDs which means multiple dvb_usb_device_properties are needed dynamic USB ID support ------------------- * currently not supported by DVB USB analog support for the DVB USB ------------------- * currently not supported by DVB USBIn order to add analog support, it is likely simpler to take em28xx (mainly em28xx-video) as an example on how things are implemented on analog side. The gspca implementation may also help a lot, but it doesn't contain the tuner bits. It would be great to have an "usb_media" core implementation that would merge gspca_core, dvb_usb and USB TV bits (found on em28xx/tm6000) into a single core, but if we're taking this road, then I think you should start with this new design. The conceptual architecture used by gspca, em28xx and dvb_core are different. Merging them into a single architectural design will be a really nice project, but that would probably mean to write a new design from scratch, and then importing bits from each of the above. This is likely a big project.
Big and I do not have experience other than from the DVB devices.
* I have no experienceThe easiest way to start working with analog is to take a look at vivi.c driver. It is just a test driver that requires no hardware, and implements the basic stuff for analog. It doesn't implement the tuner logic, though.* em28xx can be converted?If you implement the analog code, it shouldn't be hard to convert em28xx. The hardest part will likely to integrate DVB USB with videobuf2 and with tuner-core. Regards, Mauro
regards Antti -- http://palosaari.fi/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html