[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HVR-1600 QAM recordings with slight glitches in them



On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:27 PM, James Courtier-Dutton
<james.dutton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are two measurements.
> 1) SNR.
> This is a measure of the quality of the signal. Bigger is better. 30dB is a
> good value. Spliters and amplifiers should only slightly reduce the SNR
> value.

30 dB for ClearQAM is actually a very marginal SNR.  It caps out at 40
dB, and as Andy pointed out, it's a logarithmic scale.  On a good
cable plant, you should expect an SNR between 35 and 40.  Anything
below 32 and you're very likely to have significant error rates.
Don't confuse it with Over-the-Air ATSC, which will typically cap out
at 30.0 dB.

I don't know why you're not seeing valid data on femon with the 950q.
It should be printing out fine, and it's on the same 0.1 dB scale.
Try running just azap and see if the SNR is reported there.

This indeed feels like a marginal signal condition problem, and Andy's
assertion is well founded that the mxl5005/s5h1409 isn't exactly the
best combo compared to more modern tuners and demodulators (Hauppauge
switched to the tda18271 and s5h1411 for the newer revision of the
HVR-1600).  The Linux driver support should be on-par with Windows
though in terms of performance as I did a bunch of work some time back
to analyze the differences which resulted in some fixes.

Cheers,

Devin

-- 
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Devices]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

Add to Google Powered by Linux