Re: [PATCH 3.0.y 0/4] Re: lirc_serial spuriously claims assigned port and irq to be in use

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> 
> >> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be
> >> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from
> >> kernel.org?
> >
> > Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except
> > 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate.
> 
> Great.  Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in
> the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work.  The
> only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of
> drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming.

So they should also go to 3.2-stable, right?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html