Re: Patches at patchwork.linuxtv.org (127 patches)
- Subject: Re: Patches at patchwork.linuxtv.org (127 patches)
- From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:21:15 +0200 (CEST)
- Cc: LMML <linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Morimoto Kuninori <morimoto.kuninori@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@xxxxxxxxx>, Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx>, Andy Walls <awalls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitri Belimov <d.belimov@xxxxxxxxx>, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pawel Osiak <pawel@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4E7A4CA4.8040205@redhat.com>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 21-09-2011 17:40, Mauro Carvalho Chehab escreveu:
> > As announced on Sept, 18, we moved our patch queue to patchwork.linuxtv.org.
> >
> > As we were without access to the old patchwork instance, I simply sent all
> > emails I had locally stored on my local mahine to the new instance and reviewed
> > all patches again. Basically, for old patches, I basically did some scripting
> > that were marking old patches as "superseded", if they didn't apply anymore.
> > I also preserved the patches that were marked as "under review" from patchwork
> > time, using some scripting and a local control file.
> >
> > So, we're basically close to what we had before kernel.org troubles (except for
> > a series of patches that I've already applied today).
> >
> > My intention is to finish review all patches marked as "new" until the end of this
> > week, and set a new tree for linux-next with our stuff (as the old one were at
> > git.kernel.org).
> >
> > Please let me know if something is missed or if some patch from the list bellow
> > is obsolete and can be marked with a different status.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mauro
> >
> >
> > == New patches ==
>
> Gah! forgot to update the URL on my script. the patch list with the right URL is:
>
> == New patches ==
> Sep, 6 2011: [v2] at91: add code to initialize and manage the ISI_MCK for Atmel ISI http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7780 Josh Wu <josh.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
More work is needed on this one
> Sep, 6 2011: [1/2,v5] media: Add support for arbitrary resolution http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7782 Bastian Hecht <hechtb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'll push the newest version of this one
> Sep,21 2011: [1/2] V4L: soc-camera: add a function to lookup xlate by mediabus code http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7909 Guennadi Liakhovetski <Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>>
> Sep,21 2011: [2/2] V4L: sh_mobile_ceu_camera: simplify scaling and cropping algorit http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7910 Guennadi Liakhovetski <Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>>
I think, these are for 3.3, unless 3.2 is sufficiently delayed
> == Patches waiting for Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> review ==
>
> Jul,10 2011: [1/3] Add 8-bit and 16-bit YCrCb media bus pixel codes http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7423 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
I didn't recognise this one as needing my review, but I agree with Laurent
in his reply to patch 2/3, that these new formats are not needed.
> Jul,12 2011: [1/5] mt9m111: set inital return values to zero http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7433 Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Is dropped as per my comment
> Jul,12 2011: [3/5] mt9m111: move lastpage to struct mt9m111 for multi instances http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7435 Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Will be in my pull request
> Jul,12 2011: [5/5] mt9m111: make use of testpattern http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7434 Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
is rejested in its present form
> Jun,24 2011: media: initial driver for ov5642 CMOS sensor http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7327 Bastian Hecht <hechtb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
is in the mainline as of 3.1-rc1
> Jul, 6 2011: [REVIEW] adv7175 mbus support http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7410 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
that wasn't even marked as "[PATCH]," was more of an RFC
> Jul,10 2011: [1/9] stringify: add HEX_STRING() http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/160 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wow, that's a weird one;-) no idea how it ended up on your list at all
> Jul,12 2011: [2/5] mt9m111: fix missing return value check mt9m111_reg_clear http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7432 Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
in 3.1-rc1
> Jul,12 2011: [v4,4/5] mt9m111: rewrite set_pixfmt http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/7436 Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ditto
> Aug,24 2011: media i.MX27 camera: remove legacy dma support http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/298 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Expecting v2.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Input]
[Video for Linux]
[Mplayer Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photos]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]
[Devices]
[Yosemite Backpacking]