[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: build #310 failed for 2.6.23-rc1-g05ff097 in linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c

To: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: build #310 failed for 2.6.23-rc1-g05ff097 in linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:01:50 +1000
Cc: linux-laptop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200707301155.12836.toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
References: <200707301058.02103.toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> <20070730194029.10a05731.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200707301155.12836.toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
Sender: linux-laptop-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:55:10 +0200 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> the patch works, now the build completed succesfully. The diff withion the .config files is :

Thanks fo testing.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpgE2Hq8HRDH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- build #310 failed for 2.6.23-rc1-g05ff097 in linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: build #310 failed for 2.6.23-rc1-g05ff097 in linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: build #310 failed for 2.6.23-rc1-g05ff097 in linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
  - From: Toralf Förster

Prev by Date: Re: build #310 failed for 2.6.23-rc1-g05ff097 in linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
Next by Date: [PATCH] [44/2many] MAINTAINERS - APM DRIVER
Previous by thread: Re: build #310 failed for 2.6.23-rc1-g05ff097 in linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
Next by thread: [PATCH] [44/2many] MAINTAINERS - APM DRIVER
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Site Home] [Linux ACPI] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]

Add to Google

Powered by Linux