| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:39 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote: > Thus, the right thing to do might be to split up the > struct pci_dev->suspend() and pci_dev->resume() calls into > > suspend() > poweroff() > poweron() > resume() No. There are very good reasons not to do that split at the pci_dev level. > and then have the generic pci error recovery routines call > suspend/resume only, skipping the poweroff-on calls. Does that > sound good? > > I'm not sure I can pull this off without having someone from > the power-management world throw a brick at me. Just keep the error recovery callbacks for now, and we might be able to provide a generic "helper" doing the watchdog thing (yes, there is a watchdog in the net core) Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-laptop" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Linux ACPI] [Kernel Newbies] [Memory] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux Resources]
|
|