|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On 08/08/2010 07:25 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > David, > > As you know, Debian and Ubuntu (and others?) opted to use 2.6.32 as the > basis for a stable release but to take DRM from 2.6.33. Now that the > stable 2.6.33 series is over, we need some other means to communicate > the most important bug fixes for DRM that should go into these > distributions. Do you have any suggestions for how we should to this? > Could you maintain a drm-2.6.33 branch? > > Ben. > Hi Ben, actually I am already maintaining a branch which combines the 2.6.32.y tree with a 2.6.33 base of drm which I now moved forward to have .34 patches of drm included. I intended to go ahead like Greg does for .27 and get as much of the later stable patches back into that tree. If I miss something, please let me know. -Stefan http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/smb/linux-2.6.32.y-drm33.z.git;a=summary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-packagers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Linux IBM ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]
![]() |