|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On 5/17/07, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...] Please don't bother ... I really want a more considered way of fixing this. If everyone decides the best way is exposing this to the user, then this is the way to do it ... however, I still don't consider this argument made out yet.
Neither do I, considering that the user can switch async scanning on at any later time with the scan=async module option. The absence of the async scan wait module will only screw things up for him later. But then I don't consider an argument made out yet for doing this via a separate module in the first place. scsi_wait_scan just does _not_ want/deserve/need to be a module. Of course, whining is useless, and discussions on lkml tend to be most constructive / progressive only over code, so I'll try and see if I can learn enough of the code in there to fix a patch to do the async scan waiting thing using some other mechanism; this module thing seems just horribly wrong/unnecessary. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-packagers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Site Home] [Linux IBM ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Rubini] [Photo] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]