On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:23:23PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 08:23:27PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > @@ -922,12 +920,7 @@ static int emmaprp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcdev);
> >
> > - if (devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res_emma->start,
> > - resource_size(res_emma), MEM2MEM_NAME) == NULL)
> > - goto rel_vdev;
> > -
> > - pcdev->base_emma = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res_emma->start,
> > - resource_size(res_emma));
> > + pcdev->base_emma = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res_emma);
> > if (!pcdev->base_emma)
> > goto rel_vdev;
>
> This was in the original code, but there is a "ret = -ENOMEM;"
> missing here, and again a couple lines down in the original code.
>
Or should that be -EIO instead of -ENOMEM? I'm not sure.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]
[Free Dating]