Patches that add sparse annotations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hello all,

I just wanted to get your opinion on if maintainers will find the
patch bellow (and other like it) to be annoying or somewhat useful?

In the following lwn article Linus is saying that if you intend to
grab a lock in one function and release it in another, you need to
inform sparse of this by adding annotations to the functions.

The patch silences the following sparse warnings:
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:1115:6: warning: 
context imbalance in 'lock_vector_lock' - wrong count at exit
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:1123:6: warning: 
context imbalance in 'unlock_vector_lock' - unexpected unlock

Best regards,
Emil Goode
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index c348c57..1ab46b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -1112,6 +1112,7 @@ int IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector(int bus, int slot, int pin,
 void lock_vector_lock(void)
 	/* Used to the online set of cpus does not change
@@ -1120,6 +1121,7 @@ void lock_vector_lock(void)
 void unlock_vector_lock(void)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]     [Free Dating]

Add to Google Powered by Linux