Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: centralize MKIMAGE and cmd_uimage definitions |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: centralize MKIMAGE and cmd_uimage definitions
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:53:13 -0400
- Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>, Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nico@xxxxxxxxxxx, Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hans-Christian Egtvedt" <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kbuild@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uclinux-dist-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, microblaze-uclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4F6B7226.8000102@wwwdotorg.org>
- Organization: wh0rd.org
- References: <1331931835-12346-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <4F6B7226.8000102@wwwdotorg.org>
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:40:38 Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 03:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > All ARCHs have the same definition of MKIMAGE. Move it to Makefile.lib
> > to avoid duplication.
> >
> > All ARCHs have similar definitions of cmd_uimage. Place a sufficiently
> > parameterized version in Makefile.lib to avoid duplication.
>
> Does this change look reasonable? It has acks from people working on 4
> of the 7 affected architectures; would you prefer acks from all?
isn't that what linux-next is for ? ;)
-mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Media]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[Free Online Dating]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]