Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: BMC150 accel support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 03:42:55PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 29/06/14 15:27, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

Please don't use my Linaro address for upstream things, use my
kernel.org one (which is the one I always use for mail and is in
MAINTAINERS).

I'm also having a bit of an issue reading the mail due to it not being
word wrapped.

> If we are dependent on regulators to leave certain states, do we have access to how long
> they take to start up?  What about bringing buses up...

> Cc'd Mark Brown on the basis he knows all sorts of hideous corners of the kernel way
> better than me ;)

With regulators the delays are handled transparently in the framework -
by the time the functions return the operation should have commpleted.
If there is a need to have a non-blocking interface we'll have to add
this.  The delays can be queried with _time() functions.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux