On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:43:05PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> >> +static inline int ata_eh_worth_retry(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> >
> > Return bool? && maybe split the patch into two - the first separating
> > out the logic into a function, the latter changing emedia handling?
>
> I think the two-liner from v2 is better.
Heh, I don't know. It probably doesn't matter all that much either
way. Let's let Jeff decide. ;)
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Filesystems]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux RAID]
[Git]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Linux Newbie]
[Share Photos]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]