Re: ata_eh_link_autopsy: Bug?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 04:27:00PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > MMmm.. even that isn't good enough, because the first ATA_QCFLAG_IO test > bypasses the rest of that logic and triggers unconditional retries. Ugh. Hmmm... the unconditional retry on ATA_QCFLAG_IO is intenttional so that known good requests from FS are guaranteed to be retried no matter how whacky the underlying device is. I'm not sure whether that was a good decision tho. Maybe we should trust the hardware a bit more. So, I'm not necessarily against changing it. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html