On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Lin,
Hi Gwendal,
>
> In the patch d9027470b88631d0956ac37cdadfdeb9cdcf2c99, I did limit the
> amount of data cleaning in some of the ata objects.
>
> If setting err_mask to 0 masks the regression I introduced in the
> patch, I may have altered too much how ata_device object is
> reinitialized when a device is found. I am digging deeper, I may have
> change the code to try to preserve the ering as much as possible.
>
> Concerning your patch, isn't adding a test (ent->eflags &
> ATA_EFLAG_OLD_ER) in ata_count_probe_trials_cb() more in line with
> speed_down_verdict_cb() code?
This could also fix the regression.
But the fundamental problem is should ata_ering_map still iterate the old
error history which were cleared already?
Lin Ming
>
> Gwendal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Filesystems]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux RAID]
[Git]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Linux Newbie]
[Share Photos]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]