Re: [isci PATCH v3 3/4] libsas: suspend / resume support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:

> libsas power management routines to suspend and recover the sas domain
> based on a model where the lldd is allowed and expected to be
> "forgetful".

What exactly does that mean?  What is there for the lldd to remember?  
Does it maintain some sort of state information about the devices 
attached to the links?

> sas_suspend_ha - disable event processing allowing the lldd to take down
>                  links without concern for causing hotplug events.
>                  Regardless of whether the lldd actually posts link down
>                  messages libsas notifies the lldd that all
>                  domain_devices are gone.
> sas_prep_resume_ha - on the way back up before the lldd starts link
>                      training clean out any spurious events that were
>                      generated on the way down, and re-enable event
>                      processing
> sas_resume_ha - after the lldd has started and decided that all phys
> 		have posted link-up events this routine is called to let
> 		libsas start it's own timeout of any phys that did not
> 		resume.  After the timeout an lldd can cancel the
>                 phy teardown by posting a link-up event.
> Storage for ex_change_count (u16) and phy_change_count (u8) are changed
> to int so they can be set to -1 to indicate 'invalidated'.
> There's a hack added to sas_destruct_devices to workaround a deadlock
> when a device is removed across the suspend cycle.  sd_remove is called
> under device_lock() and wants to async_synchronize_full(), while the
> resume path is running in an async callback and is trying to grab
> device_lock()... fun ensues.  So we guarantee that async resume actions
> have been flushed before allowing new invocations of sd_remove.

Ooh, that doesn't sound like a good way to handle it.  For one thing, 
it's possible for the resume routine to be called while the caller 
holds the device-lock for the device being resumed.  It would be best 
if the resume path defers removal of devices that have disappeared to a 
different thread.

Alan Stern

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux