On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:13:01PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > That's pretty odd. Given Hughs report as well, it sure does sound like
> > we now have some life time issues with cfqq's.
>
> Hmmm... I disabled cfqq merge logic (commented out
> cfq_close_cooperator() and the following cfq_setup_merge() calls) in
> cfq_select_queue() and neither is triggering for quite a while now.
> Maybe cfqq refcnt is getting borked over cfqq merging / splitting? It
> would also explain the low frequency of the issue too. I'll try to
> further isolate it but It would be awesome if someone more familiar
> with the logic can go over that part.
Scrap that. It triggered and yeah cfq_get_next_queue() is retrieving
empty cfqq from the service tree.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Filesystems]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux RAID]
[Git]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Linux Newbie]
[Share Photos]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]
[Linux Resources]