- To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map.
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:40 -0800
- Cc: "rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@xxxxxxxxxx>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx>, Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- List-id: <linux-ia64.vger.kernel.org>
- References: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:23:34 +0530
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch ought to go along with the patchsets that do cleanups in other
> architectures as well.. And it looks like Rusty's patchset[1] is a superset of
> Venki's patchset[2].. So, Rusty, would you kindly take this patch into your
> patchset? (It should come before the 11/12 in your patchset. This should apply
> at that point easily, because I have modified it to suit your 11/12 which also
> touches ia64).
OK, I'm officially all confused. I think I'll drop everything and wait
until it settles down. Please, someone prepare a single patch series.
The cpumask-related patches whcih I'm currently holding are:
smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch
#arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
#tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold
tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch
smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix.patch
slub-only-ipi-cpus-that-have-per-cpu-obj-to-flush.patch
fs-only-send-ipi-to-invalidate-lru-bh-when-needed.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-update.patch
mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-v9.patch
#
arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch
cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch
So I'm thinking the thing to do is to drop just the final two?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux]
[Photo]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux Hams]